Spotify CEO to Taylor Swift: Isn't $6 million enough?
Christian George Acevedo | | Nov 12, 2014 06:52 AM EST |
(Photo : Reuters) Does Taylor Swift face a double-standard?
Taylor Swift has decided to pull out her catalog from Spotify.
But it's not just Swift who's not comfortable and not "fairly compensated." There are also other artists and producers who clamor of the minimal per-stream royalty rates, leaving artists feeling terrified and devaluated.
Like Us on Facebook
Following the steps of Taylor is country singer Jason Aldean.
Spotify CEO Daniel Ek responded in a blog post, stating that "Spotify making money on the backs of artists upsets me big time."
Ek explained that Spotify aims to fight piracy, so that consumers, rather than resort to purchasing pirated records, could opt to stream music for a minimal fee.
"Our whole reason for existence is to help fans find music and help artists connect with fans through a platform that protects them from piracy and pays them for their amazing work," he wrote in the blog.
Ek even pointed that artists earn "nothing, zilch, zero" from piracy but with Spotify, the recording industry has already earned over two billion dollars.
Ek also explained that top artists, like Taylor, are more likely to earn in excess of $6 million a year.
Ek also made it clear that Spotify is paying more money than any other streaming service.
"We're paying an enormous amount of money to labels and publishers for distribution to artists and songwriters, and significantly more than any other streaming service," he said.
But scrutinizing the figures, Spotify actually hands artists an average of $0.006 - $0.0084 for stream, whereas, (take her case), Swift can sell one album for $13.99 on Target. Compute the difference and see why Swift would want to pull out her catalog.
Swift's latest album, 1989, sold over 1.2 million copies during its first week on the market.
After pulling out her catalog, Swift said that streaming services, like Spotify, "all feels to me a bit like a grand experiment," she said.
She continued that it was not her dream to "contribute my life's work to an experiment" that she does not feel compensated at all.
"I just don't agree with perpetuating the perception that music has no value and should be free." Swift continued.
Tagstaylor swift, Spotify, Daniel Ek
©2015 Chinatopix All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission
EDITOR'S PICKS
-
Did the Trump administration just announce plans for a trade war with ‘hostile’ China and Russia?
-
US Senate passes Taiwan travel bill slammed by China
-
As Yan Sihong’s family grieves, here are other Chinese students who went missing abroad. Some have never been found
-
Beijing blasts Western critics who ‘smear China’ with the term sharp power
-
China Envoy Seeks to Defuse Tensions With U.S. as a Trade War Brews
-
Singapore's Deputy PM Provides Bitcoin Vote of Confidence Amid China's Blanket Bans
-
China warns investors over risks in overseas virtual currency trading
-
Chinese government most trustworthy: survey
-
Kashima Antlers On Course For Back-To-Back Titles
MOST POPULAR
LATEST NEWS
Zhou Yongkang: China's Former Security Chief Sentenced to Life in Prison
China's former Chief of the Ministry of Public Security, Zhou Yongkang, has been given a life sentence after he was found guilty of abusing his office, bribery and deliberately ... Full Article
TRENDING STORY
-
China Pork Prices Expected to Stabilize As The Supplies Recover
-
Elephone P9000 Smartphone is now on Sale on Amazon India
-
There's a Big Chance Cliffhangers Won't Still Be Resolved When Grey's Anatomy Season 13 Returns
-
Supreme Court Ruled on Samsung vs Apple Dispute for Patent Infringement
-
Microsoft Surface Pro 5 Rumors and Release Date: What is the Latest?