New California Law Makes It Easier to Overturn Court Decisions when Experts Recant Testimony
Vittorio Hernandez | | Feb 16, 2015 03:52 AM EST |
(Photo : REUTERS/Jorge Dan Lopez) A woman, dressed as Lady Justice, stands while protesting at the entrance of the Supreme Court of Justice before former Guatemalan dictator Efrain Rios Montt's hearing in Guatemala City, January 28, 2013.
California passed a new law, which took effect in January 2015, with the man who was the inspiration behind the legislation as the first beneficiary.
The case involves 65-year-old William Richards, who was convicted in 1997 of first-degree murder of his wife, Pamela, based on a bite-mark testimony of an expert who eventually recanted, reports San Jose Mercury News.
Like Us on Facebook
The expert, Norman Sperber, said the mark was consistent with the unique features of Richards' teeth.
Richards won an appeal with a San Bernardino County court but California appealed and the original ruling stayed.
In 2012, the State Supreme Court confirmed further the court decision on a vote of 4-3. The judges said even if the expert withdrew his testimony, it did not mean that what the expert said was false, which would be ground to see a convict free.
Pamela was actually having an affair and she had informed a counselor a month before she was killed that she was afraid of her husband.
In pushing for the reversal of the court decision, Jan Stiglitz, the lawyer of Richards, insisted that the prosecution case was circumstantial.
He pointed out that blue fiber found in Pamela's fingernails did not come from Richards's shirt as well as hair and DNA on a paving stone that the prosecution alleged was used to kill her.
The California governor signed the law in September 2014. The author of the bill said expert testimony must be treated like eyewitness testimony, which when taken back, provides strong ground to overturn a conviction.
The court, though, is not pressured to reverse the decision, but Stiglitz hopes a hearing would be scheduled by March to give Richards, who has spent half of his adult life in jail, a chance to clear his name.
Commenting on these developments, Loyola Law School criminal law professor Laurie Levenson notes that a growing number of experts are recanting, not out of guilt but due to the fact that science changes. "You want a legal system that recognizes that reality," he adds.
TagsMurder, expert testimony, california
©2015 Chinatopix All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission
EDITOR'S PICKS
-
Did the Trump administration just announce plans for a trade war with ‘hostile’ China and Russia?
-
US Senate passes Taiwan travel bill slammed by China
-
As Yan Sihong’s family grieves, here are other Chinese students who went missing abroad. Some have never been found
-
Beijing blasts Western critics who ‘smear China’ with the term sharp power
-
China Envoy Seeks to Defuse Tensions With U.S. as a Trade War Brews
-
Singapore's Deputy PM Provides Bitcoin Vote of Confidence Amid China's Blanket Bans
-
China warns investors over risks in overseas virtual currency trading
-
Chinese government most trustworthy: survey
-
Kashima Antlers On Course For Back-To-Back Titles
MOST POPULAR
LATEST NEWS
Zhou Yongkang: China's Former Security Chief Sentenced to Life in Prison
China's former Chief of the Ministry of Public Security, Zhou Yongkang, has been given a life sentence after he was found guilty of abusing his office, bribery and deliberately ... Full Article
TRENDING STORY
-
China Pork Prices Expected to Stabilize As The Supplies Recover
-
Elephone P9000 Smartphone is now on Sale on Amazon India
-
There's a Big Chance Cliffhangers Won't Still Be Resolved When Grey's Anatomy Season 13 Returns
-
Supreme Court Ruled on Samsung vs Apple Dispute for Patent Infringement
-
Microsoft Surface Pro 5 Rumors and Release Date: What is the Latest?